|
|
![]() |
Site Map | Text Size:
S
M
L
|
| Home | About the OCC | News and Issuances | Publications | Tools and Forms | Topics |
News and Issuances |
OCC 2004-58
Subject: Automated Clearing House
Date: December 20, 2004 To: Chief Executive Officers and Compliance Officers of All National Banks, Federal Branches and Agencies, Technology Service Providers, Department and Division Heads, and All Examining Personnel
Description: NACHA Rule ChangesPURPOSE The purpose of this bulletin is to advise national banks and examiners of three amendments to National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA) Operating Rules that became effective in 2004. As part of an effective risk management program, banks should implement procedures to ensure compliance with these and all other NACHA Operating Rules and related Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidance. This bulletin supplements guidance on Automated Clearing House (ACH) activities outlined in the FFIEC IT Handbook, "Retail Payment Systems," dated March 2004. Background The ACH network, through which electronic payments are distributed and settled, has existed since the early 1970s.1 As the industry develops new and innovative uses for ACH, and, as both ACH activity and the number of participants in the network (including third parties) grows, risks to national banks engaged in ACH activity can be complex and not readily apparent. National banks, therefore, must have the expertise to identify ACH risks and be able to implement risk management processes to appropriately manage ACH risk. NACHA OPERATING RULES CHANGES Three amendments to NACHA Operating Rules became effective in 2004. The most important changes introduced by the amendments are described below. Accounts Receivable Conversion (ARC)2 Opt-out Amendment (Effective June 11, 2004)
Network Security Amendment (Effective September 10, 2004) Third-Party Senders4 Amendment (Effective December 10, 2004) Banks should have controls in place to restrict or refuse ACH services to potential originators engaged in questionable or deceptive business practices. However, it is important to be aware that such organizations may originate ACH payments through third-party senders that originate through the bank. Where an originator that is engaged in questionable business practices uses a third party sender, the bank bears the same or increased risk as if the bank contracted directly with the originator. The lack of a direct contractual relationship between the ODFI and originator has the potential to increase the risk to the ODFI since it risks being unable to establish a claim against the originator in the event of loss. If originators are not customers of the bank, they may fall outside the bank's know-your-customer responsibility, capability, and processes. A key risk in such a case arises from the fact that the bank may not have information about or control over these originators. To minimize credit, transaction, compliance, and reputation risk, national banks and their third-party senders should have policies and procedures in place and implemented to ensure that effective due diligence is performed on all originators. Banks must perform risk analyses on new and established relationships and must inform customers and third-party senders of their policies and procedures related to ACH exposure limits and risk management. Exposure limits Direct Access to the ACH Operator SUMMARY ACH-related products and services provide national banks with an opportunity to retain customers and attract new business. ACH transactions, however, present significant new and unique risk management and legal liability challenges to management and boards of directors. National banks should comply with NACHA Operating Rules and follow OCC- and FFIEC-related guidance in order to meet such challenges. OCC examiners should continue to assess whether a bank's ACH risk management practices are appropriate in light of the bank's ACH activities and risks. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION You may direct any related questions or comments to the Operational Risk Policy Division at (202) 874-5190. Mark L. O'Dell 1 For more information on the ACH Network, see Appendix A of OCC Bulletin 2002-2 (Jan. 14, 2002) (ACH Transactions Involving the Internet: Guidance and Examination Procedures) and the glossary of ACH terms in the bulletin. 2 Where the national bank acts as the originating bank for an originator of ARC debits, the bank should encourage its originators to take these measures. 3 Notice of the opt-out right could simply be included within the notice required by the NACHA rule that advises consumers that their checks may be used as the source document for an ACH entry. 4 It is increasingly common for a third party to act as an intermediary between an originator and an ODFI. Such a third party is known as a third-party sender. Third-party senders are a type (or subset) of third-party service provider. 5 Characteristics of high-risk ACH originations include unauthorized returns in excess of 1 percent of transaction volume, lack of a direct relationship between the ODFI and the originator, or direct access by a third party to the ACH operator. |