Comptroller of the Currency, Administrator of National Banks Ensuring a Safe and Sound National Banking System for all Americans
Advanced Search | Subject Index | Site Map | Directory | Contact the OCC  
Home
What's New
About the OCC
Banker Education
Careers at the OCC
Community Affairs
Corporate Applications
CRA Information
Consumer Complaints and Assistance
Electronic Banking
FOIA
Issuances
Legal and Regulatory
National Bank Appeals
News Releases
Publications
Description of Publications
Order Form
Comptroller's Handbook
- Safety & Soundness
- Consumer Compliance
- Asset Management
Comptroller's Licensing Manual
Director's Toolkit
Economics Working Papers
Forms/Software
Low-Income Survey
Problem Bank Guide (PDF)
Qrtrly. Derivative Fact Sheet
Public Information
Related Sites
Speeches

 
National BankNet


What is BankNet?

Publications:
How Low Can You Go? An Optimal Sampling Strategy for Fair Lending Exams

by Jason Dietrich

Abstract

This study uses Monte Carlo simulation to examine the impact of nine sampling strategies on the finite sample performance of the maximum likelihood logit estimator. Empirical researchers face a tradeoff between the lower resource costs associated with smaller samples and the increased confidence in the results gained from larger samples. Choice of sampling strategy is one tool researchers can use to reduce costs yet still attain desired confidence levels. The nine sampling strategies examined in this study include simple random sampling and eight variations of stratified random sampling. Bias, mean-square-error, percentage of models that are feasibly estimated, and percentage of simulated estimates that differ statistically from the true population parameters are used as measures of finite sample performance.

The results show stratified random sampling by action (loan approval/denial) and race of the applicant, with balanced strata sizes and a bias correction for choice-based sampling, outperforms each of the other sampling strategies with respect to the four performance measures. These findings, taken together with supporting evidence presented in Scheuren and Sangha (1998) and Giles and Courchane (2000) make a strong argument for implementing such a sampling strategy in future fair lending exams.

Disclaimer

As with all OCC Working Papers, the opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Department of the Treasury.

Any whole or partial reproduction of material in this paper should include the following citation: Jason Dietrich " How Low Can You Go? An Optimal Sampling Strategy for Fair Lending Exams, " Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, E&PA Working Paper 2001-3, August 2001.

Availability

The paper is available for viewing in Adobe's PDF format. The PDF viewer is available for download free from Adobe in versions for different platforms.

The complete paper is available in hard copy from the OCC's Communications Division. If you would like to receive a copy of a paper through the U.S. Postal Service:

  • Write to the Communications Division, Mail Stop 3-3, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Washington, DC 20219, or
  • Send an e-mail request to the Communications Division at foia-pa@occ.treas.gov.
Be sure to identify the paper(s) you want and to include your complete mailing address, including ZIP code.

OCC emblem

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency was created by Congress to charter national banks, to oversee a nationwide system of banking institutions, and to assure that national banks are safe and sound, competitive and profitable, and capable of serving in the best possible manner the banking needs of their customers.

Accessibility | Web Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Department of the Treasury | USA.gov | No Fear Act | Get Acrobat Reader | HelpWithMyBank.gov |